9/11 and SEPTEMBER CLUES

[AmongTheThugs]

Does Yank work for the man or is he just another stupid poser?

[Maat]

Does Yank work for the man or is he just another stupid poser?

Probably "just another stupid poser", ATT Although I realize 'good help is hard to find', that would be scraping the bottom of the barrel even for 'them' — or they're running out of half wits

Well, since IT's reverted to childish name calling again, I really think it's outlived its usefulness as a refresher tool now, Simon When allowed to go on too long the irrefutable points we make just get obscured by troll poo as it soils itself trying to dodge them all (typical shill/troll MO).

Looks like everyone has seen through (chain) yank's agenda anyway.
Most conspicuous in all its rambling non sequiturs, feigned 'apology' ploy and self contradictions is the absence of any serious attempt to provide an iota of evidence or even a plausible hypothesis for its mindless assertions.

Of course no one can take "real footage" of physics-defying events that cannot happen in reality, like cartoon cut-out plane shapes in steel buildings & top-down skyscraper collapses in pyroclastic flows.
And no one can take "real footage" of 'running people' who would have been evacuated & blocked from coming anywhere near the critical theater of operations.

This is one of my favorite bloopers from the 'Not There' Bros loony-toon:

@ http://www.septemberclues.info/simulated_sceneries.htm

Any pre-existing "real footage" of NY cityscapes or streets used as templates/backdrops for CGI layering of faked events still = 100% fakery! Just as motion-capture of actors' real movements used to render impossible actions &/or physiology with CGI for Hollywood movie FX = 100% fakery.

There are only two possibilities for such persistent avoidance of known, verifiable facts re behavioral psychology, photography, physics, reasoning and logic: 1.) a willfully ignorant, ego-driven dupe (who hasn't seen a Hollywood movie in 30+ years), or 2.) a deliberate shill's incredibly inept attempts to play mind games. Fail ²

Ironically, what tools like this always prove is that they obviously cannot refute the evidence exposed in Simon's & our analyses, so predictably resort to every worn-out logical fallacy and desperately try to bury it in piles of verbal excrement.

In its own self descriptive words:

"You are exposed.

Time to get a real job

Yank"

Indeed.

[whatsgoingon]

Does Yank work for the man or is he just another stupid poser?

Probably "just another stupid poser", ATT Although I realize 'good help is hard to find', that would be scraping the bottom of the barrel even for 'them' — or they're running out of half wits

Well, since IT's reverted to childish name calling again, I really think it's outlived its usefulness as a refresher tool now, Simon When allowed to go on too long the irrefutable points we make just get obscured by troll poo as it soils itself trying to dodge them all (typical shill/troll MO).

Looks like everyone has seen through (chain) yank's agenda anyway.
Most conspicuous in all its rambling non sequiturs, feigned 'apology' ploy and self contradictions is the absence of any serious attempt to provide an iota of evidence or even a plausible hypothesis for its mindless assertions.

Of course no one can take "real footage" of physics-defying events that cannot happen in reality, like cartoon cut-out plane shapes in steel buildings & top-down skyscraper collapses in pyroclastic flows.
And no one can take "real footage" of 'running people' who would have been evacuated & blocked from coming anywhere near the critical theater of operations.

This is one of my favorite bloopers from the 'Not There' Bros loony-toon:

@ http://www.septemberclues.info/simulated_sceneries.htm

Any pre-existing "real footage" of NY cityscapes or streets used as templates/backdrops for CGI layering of faked events still = 100% fakery! Just as motion-capture of actors' real movements used to render impossible actions &/or physiology with CGI for Hollywood movie FX = 100% fakery.

There are only two possibilities for such persistent avoidance of known, verifiable facts re behavioral psychology, photography, physics, reasoning and logic: 1.) a willfully ignorant, ego-driven dupe (who hasn't seen a Hollywood movie in 30+ years), or 2.) a deliberate shill's incredibly inept attempts to play mind games. Fail ²

Ironically, what tools like this always prove is that they obviously cannot refute the evidence exposed in Simon's & our analyses, so predictably resort to every worn-out logical fallacy and desperately try to bury it in piles of verbal excrement.

In its own self descriptive words:

"You are exposed.

Time to get a real job

Yank"

Indeed.

Maat, is that a melting chocolate chip on his shoulder? Clearly that chip is moving like the grid in the Atari game "breakout". Movement of his shoulder like a giant shifted pixelated block. Now Yank will avoid the issue and babel for 2 more pages of the blog thread so that the movie in no longer on the page. I agree the MO is thin veiled.

Maybe he will say low-quality video compression was used or some such nonsense.

But can he explain why the purple T-shirt guy (round bag hopping like gait) walked through the pink shirt old man with the chocolate chip shoulder?

Video compression does not explain that artifact at all. It is a totally fraudulent film.

[Heiwa]

Pointing to altered smoke, or formatting glitches, or digital rendering anomalies does NOT prove these are CGI images, it only proves a photograph was altered, not that the photograph itself was fake.

There's a difference.

Yankee,

You keep dodging the issues which should be obvious to any person with a sound brain. I have been very patient with you. You have also cluttered this thread with your blah-blah. You have consistently evaded very clear questions submitted to you. I have spent time illustrating the reasons why I believe NO 9/11 imagery can be trusted. All you have been able to offer is nothing but vapid, confusional and illogical hogwash. Bye bye, Yankee. Now you can return to your LetsRollForum friends and report how stubborn and close-minded I am.

I tried to enlighten LetsRollForum about all relevant WTC911 footage being faked using CGI, etc, etc, using some obvious examples of the ridiculous collapses ... and was immediately banned. It seems LetsRollForum is controlled by the terrorists.
This photo is alleged to show WTC1 intact bottom part A being crushed down by intact top part C (with mast on its roof) and rubble B and by gravity, while steel wall panels fall beside intact bottom part A and smoke and dust fly away in all directions.

Reason why the video (the photo is of a video) is faked is that nothing can collapse by gravity (or for any other reason, e.g. using explosives) from top down. It is basic structural damage analysis.

[Equinox]

Simon,

You are exposed.

Time to get a real job.


Yank

Go... leave... Flee from the truth...
and never return to this land again

[yankee451]

Go... leave... Flee from the truth...

Irony

and never return to this land again

Eyeroll please.

http://yankee451.com/2012/05/01/911-emergency-room/

[yankee451]

full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX6_f3cJucc


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOcf3CcD7vQ


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvcgGi_gDaw

[AmongTheThugs]

[simonshack]

...and then there were three !

Follow you ...follow me


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaR_5R3R3c

[fbenario]

...and then there were three !

Follow you ...follow me


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaR_5R3R3c

Great song, but unfortunately the album also signaled Genesis' decision to move away from prog rock into 3-minute pop songs. They did it solely to make money. How effing sad, and I've never forgiven them.

This is the best song on the album.


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqfYYrr-Zt4

[simonshack]

*
A fabulous version of the (full) DIVEBOMBER clip - courtesy of the BBC:

>>>>>>>>>> http://911myths.com/images/a/ae/BBC_MotionGallery.mov


For comparison :

[diagonal2]

[Seth]

I saw this on one of 911CNNFakes youtube channel - which I think is WebFairy's channel, but I don't know which video it's in.

Comment on:

September Clues Complete

Time: 0:25:04 - Virtual reality scene. Older bearded man with hat, sunglasses and blue shirt is describing the "jet".

Time: 0:25:08 - Black girl does not come from left or right of speaker, and she can't be seen a second before behind him as he turns - she simply appears out of nowhere.

I don't have a frame by frame video analysis software, but if someone could verify that I'm not missing something here...

[jacobs well 316]

Don't ever get discouraged! Truth will always prevail. September Clues how old? 2009? I've only just come upon it - Sept 2012 - watched it, shared it, and will continue to do so.