I believe people are very trusting of authority but that you give authority more credit than they deserve, and the people less credit.
I don't doubt the TV would work great for providing the power of suggestion to make people believe the gash was caused by a plane, but I do believe people would cry foul if the TV show didn't match what they could see with their own eyes.
You wrote: " you give authority more credit than they deserve, and the people less credit."
I trust you will agree that no one here is giving 'authority more credit than they deserve' - quite the contrary: we are exposing precisely the incompetence of the 'authorities' behind this gigantic scam. To be sure, one of the very first question people have when confronted with our findings is: "How could they (the 'authorities') possibly pull off such an audacious hoax in such a sloppy, amateurish manner?" My best answer to this question would be: "WELL, THE HOAX WORKED - AND MOST PEOPLE FELL FOR IT." I also hope you'll agree that no 'credit' is deserved by either side: the public at large was fooled (EPIC FAIL!) by a - now flatly exposed - 'cheap' magician's trick (EPIC FAIL!) - supported by a powerful media machine.You wrote: "I do believe people would cry foul if the TV show didn't match what they could see with their own eyes."
Well, the TV show itself (as demonstrated in September Clues) was replete
with both visual and verbal inconsistencies, contradictions and absurdities. It is indeed a very crappy movie. Yet, did anyone cry foul back in 2001? This, in spite of the TV show's recordings being replayed again and again? Still today, in fact, we have people viewing the TV show with their own eyes
- who STILL won't bring themselves to cry foul. What to make of that? And with this in mind, how would any firsthand 9/11 witness armed merely with a visual recollection of what he/she saw on the day make any difference? Why would the perps worry about a 'damning testimony' - if many people STILL won't cry foul when they're presented with ridiculously incongruous footage up in their faces? If someone saw "something that didn't match with the TV show"
, as you say, this guy may stand on top of a hill for another hundred years, crying foul on the top of his lungs. Who would give a damn?
As for your musings that there must exist many real, analogically-captured pictures somewhere, I can only refer you to what our member Antipodean suggested to you :
antipodean wrote:Hi yank,
the best way of doing this (IMHO), would be to post some of the images that you believe to be real, and just go from there.