9/11 and SEPTEMBER CLUES

Updates & comments about the movie that exposed the 9/11 scam

Postby hikerbiker on March 10th, 2010, 12:30 am

wraith36 on Jan 4 2010, 07:36 PM

So I'm guessing the people who welded the trade centres were of equal welding skill and there job depended on that skill.
So the welds wouldn't fail,plus with the rivets would make this an even less likely to come apart or be broken apart,


But Brit Craig Murry (Ambassador, lawyer, writer, human rights activist, honorary research fellow) explains it (after consulting nothing, apparently).

Why WTC7 went down.

"Unfortunately in construction it is extremely common for contractors not to fix or install properly all the expensive girders, ties and rebar that are supposed to be enclosed in the concrete. Supervising contractors and municipal inspectors can be corrupt."

This sells. but anything will if that is what they want to hear, and these writers like to write what they want to hear. Like NYT journalism. Also,

"But was 9/11 false flag and controlled demolition? No, I think not."

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/ ... _post.html

Has thousands of readers. Makes reference to Popular Mechanics article. Of course the publisher of PM is a high ranking member of the Ruling Elite, and so on.
hikerbiker
Member
 
Posts: 10
Joined: March 4th, 2010, 11:07 pm

Postby SimonJCP on March 10th, 2010, 12:32 am

simonshack 4 Mar 9 2010, 07:51 PM wrote:"PEER GUARDIAN" is a program that apparently checks and blocks unwanted folks peeking into your computer.

Can anyone tell me why NIST (the National Institute for Standards and Technology)
has grown an addiction to my PC? :rolleyes: :huh: :P


Image



PATRICK GALLAGHER -- DIRECTOR OF NIST

Image

"Trust me! I'm a scientist!"


Hailing from Albuquerque, N.M., Gallagher got an early introduction into the world of science. Gallagher's father worked at Sandia National Laboratories, and the younger Gallagher got to visit the facility every-so-often.

http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Patrick_D._Gallagher



Image


The Sandia National Laboratories, which are managed and operated by the Sandia Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation), are two major United States Department of Energy research and development national laboratories.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandia_Nat ... boratories




The Second Workshop on...
Fault-Tolerant Spaceborne Computing Employing New Technologies, 2009
BY GRACIOUS INVITATION ONLY

CSRI Building
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM
May 26-29, 2009

Organized by: JPL, Sandia, MITRE

http://www.zettaflops.org/spc09/home.html



Sandia was involved in faking an F-4 crash test that would become a crucial piece of evidence for debunkers/planehuggers everywhere. More information about that here:
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/03/is ... -sled.html
SimonJCP
Member
 
Posts: 156
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 12:23 pm

Postby simonshack on March 10th, 2010, 2:28 am

SimonJCP 4 Mar 9 2010, 11:32 PM wrote:
Sandia was involved in faking an F-4 crash test that would become a crucial piece of evidence for debunkers/planehuggers everywhere. More information about that here:
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/03/is ... -sled.html


omg - It's pretty much a family affair then ! Surprise, surprise! The father of the current NIST director was behind the pathetic Sandia "test" ? Great find, SimonJCP !!! Now we know what 'NIST' stands for :

N.I.S.T. = "The National Insitute of Science Tergiversation" :P

I've seen a few of these live - with my own eyes (Once, I was nearly zapped by flying debris). This is a virtually fully frontal one at about 200mph. Wall OK. Car KO - and NOT ending up on the other side of the wall. But - of course - the WTC was made of peanut butter... :rolleyes:
Image
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby fbenario on March 10th, 2010, 2:32 am

hoi.polloi 4 Mar 9 2010, 03:31 PM wrote:Maybe because they can learn something about science from you?




Perfectly hilarious!
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby simonshack on March 10th, 2010, 9:20 pm

BREAKING NEWS - March 10, 2010


Today we welcome a most encouraging statement from Andrew Johnson :



I think SImon Shack has collected and analysed enough evidence to start some legal action some how.

(in the comment section of this video on Andrew Johnson's channel):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_4NrRioRPU




I hope this may translate into a very interesting development within the sphere of the cutting-edge 9/11 research.
Of course, I also hope I'm not over-optimistic about this. Let's wait and see ! :)
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby hoi.polloi on March 10th, 2010, 9:35 pm

simonshack 4 Mar 10 2010, 08:20 PM wrote: BREAKING NEWS - March 10, 2010


Today we welcome a most encouraging statement from Andrew Johnson :



I think SImon Shack has collected and analysed enough evidence to start some legal action some how.

(in the comment section of this video on Andrew Johnson's channel):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_4NrRioRPU




I hope this may translate into a very interesting development within the sphere of the cutting-edge 9/11 research.
Of course, I also hope I'm not over-optimistic about this. Let's wait and see ! :)


You had them at September Clues, 2007 version.

However, maybe if enough people start recognizing (in better spelling, optimistically, though beggars can't be choosers) that you've analyzed enough evidence to put a great deal of people on trial in the Hague, it can actually happen. Unfortunately, it seems the Hague court is used in part to destroy what is left of the already former Yugoslavia and .... not do much else.

I have tried contacting the UN's various departments on this matter and nobody is willing to take it seriously, depsite listening carefully - I expect, for the most part - because there isn't a clamor.

If there's a clamor, I think we can expect to see some conclusive action on this in the coming decade. Now might be the time for us to start cold-calling representatives.
hoi.polloi
Administrator
 
Posts: 4826
Joined: November 14th, 2010, 8:24 pm

Postby MartinL on March 10th, 2010, 9:49 pm

Hey guys, since we started pushing the latest discoveries in the vicsim research there has been started a massive discrediting campaing where slander is chosen over evidence when they are promoting their little psy-op.

So please, feel free to knock these shills out with some hard facts and evidence. That usually shuts them up ;)

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread550030/pg1

and

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread549529/pg1


I don't think their shill tactics will work on people who are awake. Most people I have shown this to realizes that TV fakery, and now fabricated identities who never existed is of massive importance.

Shills always accuse me of "causing division in the truth movement", so let's put an end to it and have everyone gather around the real evidence.

The 911 perpetrators are crashing and burning as we speak, so let's turn on the heat.

:ph43r:


BTW! Amazing find on NIST!!! WOW
MartinL
Member
 
Posts: 319
Joined: October 19th, 2009, 11:08 am

Postby simonshack on March 11th, 2010, 10:32 pm

*

INDEPENDENCE DAY

ImageImageImageImageImage

This is such a hilarious piece I just had to share it.
Ron Insana describes WTC collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2c4DRR_150


On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA (covered in white dust).
Mr. Insana says that he was on the scene but the area was cordoned off ( of course ;) ... ).
Then at 1:47 into the video, Ron Insana goes :

"Much like the images that were created for the movie INDEPENDENCE DAY..."


Woooo - those media people have pretty vivid imaginations, don't they?
I thought it was only me ! :lol:
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby brianv on March 11th, 2010, 10:38 pm

simonshack @ Mar 11 2010, 10:32 PM wrote: *

INDEPENDENCE DAY

This is such a hilarious piece I just had to share it.
Ron Insana describes WTC collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2c4DRR_150


On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA (covered in white dust).
Mr. Insana says that he was on the scene but the area was cordoned off ( of course ;) ... ).
Then at 1:47 into the video, Ron Insana goes :

"Much like the images that were created for the movie INDEPENDENCE DAY..."


Woooo - those media people have pretty vivid imaginations, don't they?
I thought it was only me ! :lol:


Talc! FFS.
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Postby simonshack on March 11th, 2010, 10:50 pm

brianv 4 Mar 11 2010, 09:38 PM wrote: Talc! FFS.


Sorry Brian. Errata corrige:

On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA ( covered in talc ) :P
Image

Image

Of course, million-dollar TV studios do NOT provide replacement suits
( or even cleaning services ) for people to be interviewed on a live show. :lol:

You've got to be freaking kiddin' me. This wretched hoax is simply over-stupid.
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby brianv on March 12th, 2010, 1:11 am

simonshack 4 Mar 11 2010, 10:50 PM wrote:
brianv 4 Mar 11 2010, 09:38 PM wrote: Talc! FFS.


Sorry Brian. Errata corrige:

On NBC, Tom Brokaw interviews his collegue RON INSANA ( covered in talc ) :P
Image

Image

Of course, million-dollar TV studios do NOT provide replacement suits
( or even cleaning services ) for people to be interviewed on a live show. :lol:

You've got to be freaking kiddin' me. This wretched hoax is simply over-stupid.


Either that or he has a bad 'charlie' habit!

No but seriously he has just come out of 'wardrobe' and 'make-up'. The talcum powder was self administered by the looks of the splash pattern.

Make that 10-15 million-dollar Simon!
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Postby brianv on March 12th, 2010, 11:43 am

Every report on every channel adheres to the same format. Listen to this one, it's a perfect example of how the emotions are being tugged at!

1) The Destruction, the narrow escape. etc
2) The Box of Spanners, I mean "Heroes". ( The cops, the firemen, ambulance crews)
3) The "Victims".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2c4DRR_150
brianv
Member
 
Posts: 3878
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 11:19 pm

Postby fbenario on March 18th, 2010, 9:22 pm

Why the hell are so few of this 6%, who agree there were no planes, participating in this forum?


"The survey asked respondents whether four things that have been said and written about the events of 9/11 are actually credible. Just 15 per cent of respondents think the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition, and the same proportion believe that United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down.

In addition, 13 per cent of respondents think no airplane actually crashed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, and six per cent claim that no airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center at all."

http://www.visioncritical.com/2010/03/a ... brication/
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby simonshack on March 18th, 2010, 10:00 pm

fbenario 4 Mar 18 2010, 08:22 PM wrote: Why the hell are so few of this 6%, who agree there were no planes, participating in this forum?




Perhaps because we have NO multi-million dollar media organization behind us to diffuse our findings ? B)

I'd say that 6% (of people who know NO airplane hit the towers) is a fantastic achievement in only 2 and 1/2 years ! :)
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby proloft on March 18th, 2010, 10:12 pm

fbenario 4 Mar 18 2010, 08:22 PM wrote:Why the hell are so few of this 6%, who agree there were no planes, participating in this forum?


"The survey asked respondents whether four things that have been said and written about the events of 9/11 are actually credible. Just 15 per cent of respondents think the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition, and the same proportion believe that United Airlines Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was shot down.

In addition, 13 per cent of respondents think no airplane actually crashed at the Pentagon on Sept. 11, and six per cent claim that no airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center at all."

http://www.visioncritical.com/2010/03/a ... brication/




I wouldn't believe that figure at all.

You see, most people do not want to be in the minority; viewed by others as tinfoil hat-wearing kooks.

There is safety and security when you go along with everybody else.

Don't you remember back to grade school days when everyone was afraid to ask
the teacher a question because they were worried that the rest of the class would
make fun of them? That's precisely the technique used here.

Fear and ignorance are the best tools that a criminal can have and
they're using it to the absolute best of their ability, squeezing out every last drop
of bullshit and lies and feeding it to the trusting viewers.

That's how scams like 9/11 continue to this day.
proloft
Member
 
Posts: 93
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 10:58 pm

PreviousNext

Return to September Clues - the movie

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest