9/11 and SEPTEMBER CLUES

Unread post by **hoi.polloi** » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:54 pm

I like your question antipodean. I want to ask it too. UK and BBC ... hmmm.

I also have a second question: should we move/duplicate this topic to the public forum so that all members can interact with Simon like the old 911movement.org version of this topic?

I am not opposed to leaving the Public Forum without the Q&A and therefore restricting strangers, but I think Simon ... the reason you were tempted to open up the forum to all members again was because you missed the direct interaction, which is why you created the brilliant new "Debunk a September Clue" topic in the Public Forum.

So my question is - do you want a public forum Q&A that you personally can deal with for your own amusement and for legit readers' benefit? Do you want to move this one there or maybe create a new one there specifically for all members?

-hp

Unread post by **simonshack** » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:03 pm

hoi.polloi 4 Jul 31 2010, 11:54 PM wrote:

I am not opposed to leaving the Public Forum without the Q&A and therefore restricting strangers, but I think Simon ... the reason you were tempted to open up the forum to all members again was because you missed the direct interaction, which is why you created the brilliant new "Debunk a September Clue" topic in the Public Forum.

So my question is - do you want a public forum Q&A that you personally can deal with for your own amusement and for legit readers' benefit? Do you want to move this one there or maybe create a new one there specifically for all members?

-hp

Excellent idea, Hoi. I will shortly open a "SEPTEMBER CLUES Q & A" thread in the Public Message Board. My opening post will contain a succinct summary of our findings - and some tips/direct links as to where to find specific topics in the http://www.septemberclues.org website. :)

Unread post by **simonshack** » Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:28 am

Youtube friend 'elbuggo' just sent me this link:

http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/forum ... imon-shack

Someone has proposed me as a guest on FOX's "Freedom Watch" show ! Fancy that ! :lol:

And hey! Richard Gage is only 2 points ahead of me at this moment (18 against 16)... http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/pages ... top&page=5

Unread post by **MartinL** » Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:04 pm

simonshack @ Aug 7 2010, 09:28 AM wrote: Youtube friend 'elbuggo' just sent me this link:

http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/forum ... imon-shack

Someone has proposed me as a guest on FOX's "Freedom Watch" show ! Fancy that ! :lol:

And hey! Richard Gage is only 2 points ahead of me at this moment (18 against 16)... http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/pages ... top&page=5

Actually you are 4 points ahead of him (18 to 22) <_<

Unread post by **hoi.polloi** » Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:56 pm

Ranked 69th now ... before, you were in the 80's.

Unread post by **simonshack** » Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:50 pm

hoi.polloi 4 Aug 8 2010, 09:56 PM wrote: Ranked 69th now ... before, you were in the 80's.

Update: Hehe... have just overtaken Alexei Jonesy - and snapping at Jesse Ventura's buttocks! :lol: :lol: :P
http://freedomwatch.uservoice.com/pages ... top&page=3

Edit: Whoops - looks like I gobbled Ventura ... B)

Update : inside the top 50 now ... Aughh! Stop voting! If I get to meet any of these foxy weasels I'm gonna punch someone on the nose and go to jail!... :P

Unread post by **simonshack** » Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:48 am

A masterful September Clues "mash-up" video from Youtube user "ProtectAus"!
The soundtrack is phenomenal and hilarious at times - highly recommended viewing ...even if you've "seen it all before"... B)

EXPOSED! THE 9/11 TV MOVIE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgneseWjgqk

Unread post by **hoi.polloi** » Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:04 am

:lol:

Wow! They did what we were planning to do only more amateurish ... and they bothered to officially keep all those copyrighted songs. Interesting.

Let's see if it sustains a decent skeptical outlook or turns 180 degrees on September Clues like most people who put some effort into appearing to support it.

(You may have noticed Mr. "Protect Australia" attempts to debunk every other conspiracy, and even goes so far as to endorse GoogleEarth NASA information for his "Moon Landing was a Hoax - NOT!" video.)

We should be on our toes about which endorsers we "endorse" Simon!

Unread post by **simonshack** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:15 am

hoi.polloi 4 Aug 20 2010, 12:04 AM wrote: :lol:

Wow! They did what we were planning to do only more amateurish ... and they bothered to officially keep all those copyrighted songs. Interesting.

"They?"

As for now, it is "John from Australia".

Until we know better, we shouldn't use the "they" word.

John wrote to me about Hoi's comment. saying that he's just one guy. Do we have the magic wand to be totally sure that he's not sincere? No.

In fact, one of the most annoying things I went through when I published September Clues was people assuming I was some kind of organization.

Let us not make the same errors. John may believe in the moon landings. So what? Let him give it a go!

Unread post by **hoi.polloi** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:37 am

Until we know better, I am going to use the gramatically incorrect but closest English equivalent of a generic pronoun.

('they' in slang also means 'he/she/it')

You assume so much good intentions, Simon. All the time. It's a problem. I don't believe in good intentions until I see them stick around a few years. I also don't buy his weak, unfounded belief in NASA! Obviously, he is missing some of the pieces if he is going to blindly follow September Clues without applying his critical thinking elsewhere.

Don't you remember all the countless times someone makes a video supporting your work and then turns around on everything else? Must you forget every time someone starts out doing exactly what you want?

Let people be a little skeptical of ego strokers! Cripes!

Let's just wait and see if the Australian Defender earns trust before we give it so freely.

Unread post by **simonshack** » Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:32 am

hoi.polloi @ Aug 25 2010, 12:37 AM wrote:
Let's just wait and see if the Australian Defender earns trust before we give it so freely.

Allright.

Let's wait and see.

Unread post by **simonshack** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:41 pm

*

I have just uploaded a Youtube version (with music) of

"SYNCHED OUT"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XHv0PAdeUs

Here's the video description I just put together. If anyone has suggestions for improving it, please let me know:

The first 11 minutes of the 9/11 TV broadcasts - as aired by the 5 major US networks.

Dear reader:
Before leaving your comments/questions here, please do get familiar with my website. Thanks for taking the time to do so - I have been spending countless hours answering to similar/identical questions regarding my longstanding 9/11 research - yet 99% of them should all be duly explained here :

septemberclues.org
http://www.septemberclues.org

9/11 was a staged event to simulate a terror attack on the USA. The only reality of the day was the destruction of the fully evacuated WTC complex (9 buildings in all). There were no hijacked planes and therefore no passengers. This fact has long been established and never been seriously challenged. More recently, all the indications of the ongoing research gathered on our forum (see link below) suggest that the WTC towers were fully evacuated or/and simply closed for access on that morning. The vast majority (and possibly all) of the "3000" victims are demonstrably fictitious identities made up on a computer database. The few dozen individuals impersonating "mourning family members" (and steadily showcased by the fully complicit news media) are nothing but actors cast in a supporting role of the wider 9/11 simulation script. It has also emerged that several other events blamed on "AL-QAEDA" (such as LONDON 7/7) are similarly simulated and betray the exact same psyop patterns employed on 9/11 to fool the unsuspecting public.

Our research forum:
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shack

The level of complicity in this massive hoax is thus no longer a mystery: the people involved were not told they were to be accesories to a mass murder - only silent recipients of formidable gains generated through countless opportunistic money scams connected to the operation. Of course, it was certainly a very welcome propaganda-stunt for the military-industrial complex who obtained a free pass to invade and loot prime resources in foreign countries. The can of worms is now wide open - it is up to the resonable people of this world to decide if they want to have any of this - or just say "no".

May reason prevail.

Oh - and don't forget to "thumb it" (any which way you like - of course B) )

Unread post by **brianv** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 8:30 pm

Hi Si.

Wonderful vid! Re : the jumper question on youtube!

Ask the commenter how many "jumpers" he saw while watching the live footage!! Five channels!

PS Yer bloody PM box is full!

Unread post by **hoi.polloi** » Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:02 pm

Excellent work. It turned out great! :wub:

If people cannot understand the "only show the fake plane one station at a time, without overlapping their sequence" strategy employed by the bastards calling themselves 'News' here, then we have a long way to go.

If they do understand it, I think this video is liable to free a lot of minds from corporate dominated interests.

Unread post by **simonshack** » Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:22 am

*
September 11, 2010

I just wanted to thank everyone for this year's efforts - tremendous progress has been made, so much in fact that I believe we can now technically declare victory over the 9/11 deception. What remains is to... just tell everyone about it ! :)

May reason prevail