


Sidewalk chalking provokes police - Napa Woman Cites Free Speech

Farcevalue wrote:
The strength of SC is verifiable proof. I much prefer seeing SC portrayed in the even and professional way that I have seen demonstrated by Ab Irato and Hoi on the Wave Project. (BTW, that broadcast is archived on the KFAI website, and I recorded and archived it, edited w/o commercials or names. Am just not FTP capable yet. I could set up a drop box link for anyone who is interested, I guess.)
hoi.polloi wrote:As long as they can show there is some physical 'ground work' being done to promote 9/11 truth, it has a strange effect on the American psyche: it keeps them at home, waiting for a solution from above! One of the stranger effective methods of crowd control is leading the crowd yourself. I guess that's also why we had the Jeff Hill personality contacting "photographers" and ultimately trying to lead investigators to the dramatic discovery that an airplane somehow squeezed into that tightly controlled Pentagon scene! (The hole in the Pentagon is tighter than a Pentagon sphincter.)
This got me thinking: is Brian S Staveley a simulated entity? The spelling on his site is decent enough, but when he appeared on this site, he started hitting keys twice, forgetting to capitalize words and generally his entire text persona disintegrated. He also refers to himself occasionally in the third person on his site - in the title of the show - which could be construed as humor but of what kind? Mocking his own role as a pretender?
His picture also looks a bit peculiar to me. I could be wrong, but it is awkward in more than just the forgivable social appearance of being a friend cut off the picture - reminds me of the paper-doll arms around the vicsims.
I am sorry if this is considered 'in-fighting' by Simon but let me just postulate the following: the perpetrators are finally forced to acknowledge there is a common, layman interest in this research and they are now using actual layman tools instead of just more military base cubical style cyber-attacks. So they have layered their more 'sophisticated' simulation in a coat of 'authentic'-appearing shitty web tools. So they have another front to attack on: enclosing those more free of the simulation into a closed loop - promoting 'September Clues' and controlling a bit of the dialogue around it to eventually lead people - like the Jeff Hill perp entity - to a depressing reliance on more fake stories.
We may suddenly be flooded by 'real witnesses' who declare September Clues to be the closest to the truth, then those 'real witnesses' will go on to describe a Reptillian brotherhood of ridiculousness. Or merely soften people's critical thinking. Et cetera. This could easily have been anticipated by our constantly posting our findings on the wide Internet. Jayhan was one of the earlier ones, and now the Brian S Staveley personality.
Now, please, bear with me. This is just speculation. The horrible accident Brian S Staveley encountered recently could be real or it could be an act. Who cares? As "one born free" opines, it may not be too important just who (or what) is providing good research, but the quality of information should be judged. I agree with this sentiment. But imagine the following scenario: fake people surround and become the best promoters of 'September Clues', and this means the most absurd dramas can be injected into the prosaic, can lead people away from the discoveries of how much is faked daily.
So I think I am going to avoid this kind of promotion-by-others kind of thing now. It doesn't quite feel right yet. I'd like to see more people I see as 'real folks' in it than online entities that give me this feeling.

Brian S Staveley wrote:Yeah Brian V he is retarded. He's calling me a fake identity and saying the pic looks shopped like a vicsim pic and he didn't even bother to look at the EASILY available original with all three of us in it. You've never done anything but bash me either so your words don't mean shit to me.
So Brian answer the question. Look at those pics of me. Do you think I'm a fake identity??
hoi.polloi wrote:As long as they can show there is some physical 'ground work' being done to promote 9/11 truth, it has a strange effect on the American psyche: it keeps them at home, waiting for a solution from above! One of the stranger effective methods of crowd control is leading the crowd yourself. I guess that's also why we had the Jeff Hill personality contacting "photographers" and ultimately trying to lead investigators to the dramatic discovery that an airplane somehow squeezed into that tightly controlled Pentagon scene! (The hole in the Pentagon is tighter than a Pentagon sphincter.)
This got me thinking: is Brian S Staveley a simulated entity? The spelling on his site is decent enough, but when he appeared on this site, he started hitting keys twice, forgetting to capitalize words and generally his entire text persona disintegrated. He also refers to himself occasionally in the third person on his site - in the title of the show - which could be construed as humor but of what kind? Mocking his own role as a pretender?
His picture also looks a bit peculiar to me. I could be wrong, but it is awkward in more than just the forgivable social appearance of being a friend cut off the picture - reminds me of the paper-doll arms around the vicsims.
I am sorry if this is considered 'in-fighting' by Simon but let me just postulate the following: the perpetrators are finally forced to acknowledge there is a common, layman interest in this research and they are now using actual layman tools instead of just more military base cubical style cyber-attacks. So they have layered their more 'sophisticated' simulation in a coat of 'authentic'-appearing shitty web tools. So they have another front to attack on: enclosing those more free of the simulation into a closed loop - promoting 'September Clues' and controlling a bit of the dialogue around it to eventually lead people - like the Jeff Hill perp entity - to a depressing reliance on more fake stories.
We may suddenly be flooded by 'real witnesses' who declare September Clues to be the closest to the truth, then those 'real witnesses' will go on to describe a Reptillian brotherhood of ridiculousness. Or merely soften people's critical thinking. Et cetera. This could easily have been anticipated by our constantly posting our findings on the wide Internet. Jayhan was one of the earlier ones, and now the Brian S Staveley personality.
Now, please, bear with me. This is just speculation. The horrible accident Brian S Staveley encountered recently could be real or it could be an act. Who cares? As "one born free" opines, it may not be too important just who (or what) is providing good research, but the quality of information should be judged. I agree with this sentiment. But imagine the following scenario: fake people surround and become the best promoters of 'September Clues', and this means the most absurd dramas can be injected into the prosaic, can lead people away from the discoveries of how much is faked daily.
So I think I am going to avoid this kind of promotion-by-others kind of thing now. It doesn't quite feel right yet. I'd like to see more people I see as 'real folks' in it than online entities that give me this feeling.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests