ACE BAKER - top September Clues "plagiarist"

How the controlled opposition was designed to be part of the 9/11 hoax
Posts: 1914
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: ACE BAKER - top September Clues "plagiarist"

Unread post by lux » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:38 am

Who must give permission to record a telephone or in-person conversation?

Federal law permits recording telephone calls and in-person conversations with the consent of at least one of the parties. See 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(d). This is called a "one-party consent" law. Under a one-party consent law, you can record a phone call or conversation so long as you are a party to the conversation. Furthermore, if you are not a party to the conversation, a "one-party consent" law will allow you to record the conversation or phone call so long as your source consents and has full knowledge that the communication will be recorded.

In addition to federal law, thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia have adopted "one-party consent" laws and permit individuals to record phone calls and conversations to which they are a party or when one party to the communication consents. source
But, though it's probably legal, that doesn't mean it isn't underhanded.

Posts: 7017
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: ACE BAKER - top September Clues "plagiarist"

Unread post by simonshack » Fri Nov 15, 2013 10:55 pm

Alexander Collin Baker on fecebook:


"Who is Ace Baker'?"

Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:00 pm

Re: ACE BAKER - top September Clues "plagiarist"

Unread post by sunshine05 » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:35 am

Thanks for the summary, Simon. I'm sorry he treated you that way. It's difficult for me to understand how anyone can watch the 9/11 footage and Sandy Hook and Boston and more and not see the media fakery. Once you understand what they've been doing, there is no going back and it's just so blatantly obvious. This site is the only place with the real truth and I'm grateful for it.

Post Reply