"FALLING MAN" - the phony jumpers

The notion of 'thousands of victims' was crucial to generate universal public outrage. However, having 3000 angry families breathing down their necks was never part of the perps' demented plan. Our ongoing analyses and investigations suggest that NO one died on 9/11.

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Thunder on March 29th, 2012, 4:22 pm

She is, here she's talking about it: http://www.history.com/videos/caroline-dries-on-911
Thunder
Member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: March 25th, 2012, 5:32 pm

Re: MISSING!

Postby MrSinclair on April 8th, 2012, 4:37 am


full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8oXH9TdDuc

During the video an instrumental version of the BeeGee's "How Deep Is Your Love" starts to play. One of the lyrics in this song is "you're my Savior when I fall".
MrSinclair
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: December 23rd, 2011, 2:29 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby fbenario on April 9th, 2012, 1:27 am

reel.deal wrote:Image

Yep, as I've said repeatedly, even a single faked image/video means The Event, as described by the media, DID NOT OCCUR. PERIOD.
fbenario
Member
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 2:49 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby simonshack on April 9th, 2012, 12:31 pm

Just for the record:

Binladen's name was actually provided to us 41seconds after the 2nd "strike" - which is roughly 18minutes after the 1st "strike" (not 45min).

Proof here - at 4:40 into SEPTEMBER CLUES D: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuB4jLAuVLk
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6431
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby SmokingGunII on April 10th, 2012, 9:31 pm

As one who estimated that one of the featured jumpers in your montage was 8' tall in an earlier post in this thread, I have to say I just love this GIF RD! :lol: :blink: :D
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby simonshack on April 10th, 2012, 10:27 pm

reel.deal wrote:shit ! the telephoto zoom nearly got crushed !!!
:o


Great one, reel deal! :lol:

This goes straight into our collection of slam-dunk proof of 9/11 image fakery.

KING KONG-------------------versus-----------------DANNY DE VITO?
Image

Does any photographic wiz wish to challenge this? Is anyone going to bring up "focal distortion" issues here? Let's hear from you!
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6431
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby icarusinbound on April 15th, 2012, 11:21 am

2003 release? Kind of close to the main event, I mean for 'reverence and respect' purposes (though I suppose 18months-2yrs might be the standard Hollywood sequel release lag-time...)

But from your last link...am I being taken in by this, surely this is parody? Subjective message broadcasting... is that the overt equivalent of subliminal messaging? Is this a gamers' RPG equivalent of 'Brass Eye'?
Classification

SERIOUS GAME

Purpose

Besides play, this title features the following intents:
Subjective message broadcasting
Market

This title is used by the following domains:
Politics
Audience

This title targets the following audience:
Age : 17-25 / 25-35
General Public
Gameplay

The gameplay of this title is Game-based
(designed with stated goals)
icarusinbound
Member
 
Posts: 393
Joined: November 28th, 2011, 9:49 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby nonhocapito on April 16th, 2012, 1:50 am

reel.deal wrote:Image
Image

The '93 WTC TruckBomb 'workers @ windows' are fake as fuck aswell, btw...
<_<



I've never seen these ones, rd, where do they come from? Are both of them from 1993?
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby lux on April 17th, 2012, 2:59 am

FYI - it is common practice in Hollywood when a distant group of people is to be represented, such as spectators at a sporting event, to use lots of 2D cutouts with real extras interspersed amongst them. The cutouts are life-sized enlarged photos of real people. The real extras amongst them add motion to the scene and complete the illusion. There are agencies that provide these cutouts for movie productions. The effect works surprisingly well as it's hard to tell a life size photo of a person from a real person at a distance. They've been used in many movies that you've probably seen without noticing. It also saves lots of money on pay and meals for extras.
lux
Member
 
Posts: 1914
Joined: October 1st, 2011, 11:46 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby SmokingGunII on April 17th, 2012, 2:23 pm

LOLOLOL.

These 93 fakes are horrendous! I think it is slowly becoming clear that 93 was not only the precursor to 9/11, but a trail run for some of the fakery!

I confess that I don't know the composition of the WTC glass, but I would be surprised if it was less than 10mm thick and either laminated or toughened (which shatters to safe particles when impacted).

Whatever the composition, one would expect to see the suspended ceiling panels through the holes rather than the "black" caused by the eraser tool in Photoshop! :lol: :P
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 557
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby hollycrap on April 18th, 2012, 11:07 am

Image

Image

:blink:
hollycrap
Member
 
Posts: 223
Joined: March 25th, 2012, 2:04 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Equinox on April 18th, 2012, 11:14 am

hollycrap wrote:
Image

:blink:


Image
Austin Powers??
:lol:
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby whatsgoingon on April 18th, 2012, 3:19 pm

a
Last edited by whatsgoingon on May 24th, 2013, 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
whatsgoingon
DELETED THEIR OWN POSTS :(
 
Posts: 578
Joined: October 13th, 2011, 8:56 pm

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby Equinox on April 22nd, 2012, 9:22 am

hey Reel or (anyone)
have you done a post on this falling image accredited to Allan Tannenbaum ? Much help would be appreciated B)
Image
Equinox
Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: October 14th, 2010, 9:45 am

Re: FALLING MAN

Postby simonshack on April 22nd, 2012, 11:30 am

*

EDNA CINTRON ABERRATION

This image is impossible - for one simple reason:

THICK SMOKE WAS SEEN GUSHING OUT OF THIS GASH FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE MORNING !

Image

Therefore, the above image is impossible. And so is the below image:
THERE IS HARDLY ANY SMOKE TO BE SEEN AT ALL!!!


Image

In fact, this may be one of the worst cock-ups by the "9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" ! As they decided to release (at some later stage) these close-up images of the gash (with people seen standing in it!), they completely forgot about the fact that the 9/11 TV imagery showed, uninterruptedly, thick smoke gushing out of the gash...

for the entire duration of their 102-MINUTE made-for-TV Hollywood movie!!!


...from start...
Image

...to finish...
Image
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 6431
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

PreviousNext

Return to VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests