What you said is important.fred 4 Jan 14 2010, 08:16 AM wrote: The goals of the terrorists' infiltration and disinformation operations in 2009 were to:
--Discredit all research pointing to the simulation technology used on 9-11.
--Create the illusion of endless infighting and bickering amongst popular researchers
--Sacrifice the prominent 'no-planers' (Jesus Shayler, Moon-base Lear, etc)
--Shut down major forums and channels (911movement takedown / blackmail)
--Intimidate individual researchers through FBI visits, public exposure, and blackmail
--Shunt all no-planes supporters into a 'online petting zoo' at PumpItOut by rallying around the most charismatic infiltrator in their stable
--Protect their undiscovered "victim family witness" actors/agents in the field (Mark Humphrey, Jersey Girls, etc.)
I would say that their activities were a resounding failure, and that as knowledge of the simulation spreads like wildfire across the internet, the odds of their being able to maintain the hoax through 2010 are low.
EXPOSING THE 9-11 ACTORS, ACTRESSES, AND VICTIM HOAXES DESTROYS THE ENTIRE TERRORIST MYTH!
Will a whole cast of fake family members and witnesses go into soap-opera retirement in 2010 as the flesh-and-blood actors refuse to carry out their mission because the job has become too dangerous?
In 2009 the shills tried killing themselves on live radio and pretending that planes crashed into their houses.
Perhaps in 2010 the remaining fakes will succumb to influenza, get beheaded by Yemeni underwear bombers, drop into comas, or be run over by taxi-cabs.
This is kinda stupid, but I think it's difficult to explain how a simulation might be managed enough for a complex lie to be maintained, so I tried to explain it in this graphic.
1. First, the players are established. Possibly contracted, but probably already on board with a plan, possibly helping create it. This is disturbing, but at some point this has to be the case: expert liars lie to people they are close to and who trust them. It is sad, but it is the only way anything could get a foothold for the rest.
2. Next, the lie is realized and developed. Virtual scenarios, people and events are maintained from a database of the SimCity or SimEarth that remains in military-like control.
3. This control is tested by commanders of the lie ...
b-(4) ultimately becoming a safety window for a crime to take place in full public civilization without too many immediate problems. It also helps immensely if the sensationalism of the disinfo is FAR MORE INTERESTING than the crime itself.
---
Finally, there must be a "step 5" written about which includes everything Fred talks about - basically the attempt to wipe clean any leaks or imperfect accomplishments. Those imperfections ultimately become what people like us find and clue us in to what went wrong. By that time, the original operants are on the run and have cut off ties. However, the maintenance of the lie for the people having to manage it post-crime (the bright red folks listed as "cooperatives" above) must be tiring.
And the people paying them to continue doing it must be running out of patience for them to solve all their mistakes in covering the crime. I wouldn't want to be in Ace Baker's shoes right now.