Tufa wrote:This text is extremely speculative, and not based upon observations. It is for research purposes only, with the aim of illustrating:
If we don't know, the reality could have been much different compared to the TV version. A lot of people can easily be made to cooperate. They will keep silent!
You cannot "chock" them, either, by telling them that there where no "Planes". They already know that the video is a fake and also the planes and NIST-reports and all that.
The typical main question is all the people, who work at the Towers or a company that rent space. The reality is rather contradictive to the intuitive approach. You simply just ask them to cooperate, and they will!
You tell them some super-traumatic story that an A-bomb is in the building, that will soon blow up most of the N.Y. city. You then tell them that a fake and successful "attack" is to be fabricated to fool "the terrorists" into believing another terrorist group got to the towers first. Make this credible, and make them sign a military secrecy agreement
The conclusion is that you can take down the Towers any way you like, as long as you complete the work in the allocated time frame... This is a major argument against any/all more esoteric conspiratorial scenarios, such as using UFO-style death ray weapons, using A-bombs in the basement, UFO attack, licorice steel effect, etc.
You can take down the towers using conventional means. A controlled demolition use(s) a computer-controlled sequence of shape-charges..." followed by some rather dubious if not laughable explanation of the technique.
A problem is that you need to clear the demolition site really fast afterwards. You don't want any one to show up with a camera!
Some of us thought, that when the towers are on the ground, a photo of the rubble with a fire-fighter could be a genuine photo. This was investigated late in 2010, where all such photos was found to be fake, including overall photos with N.Y. and a small demolition site.
artreddin wrote:Or are you now going to suggest that the top-down billowing fountains of debris that were WTC1 and WTC2 (as contrasted with WTC7) were just so much fake video imagery?
artreddin wrote: Please explain to me once again about confiscating the cameras from prying eyes on other high-rise buildings near Ground Zero... and while you're at it perhaps you'd like to elucidate the mechanism of payoffs to the small media and networks of other countries taking footage on the ground on 9-11 and subsequent days and weeks.
"World Trade Center" is the most un-Oliver- Stone-like film by Oliver Stone: no ideologies, no conspiracy theories, just a very heart-wrenching portrayal of two policemen trapped among the ruins. (...)
Sony KDL32D3000 colour bit depth and noise reduction prowess was demonstrated amply too: smoke swirling around the rubble was rendered cleanly without the slightest trace of dithering or banding, reinforcing the lingering sense of chaos and dread.
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/Sony-KDL32D30 ... y.php#nogo
Perhaps, EMP/HERF devices ensured that no photography was possible (during the notoriously rapid timeframe of the rubble disposal).
artreddin wrote: How, in fact, do you take down 110 story skyscrapers in the middle of Manhattan? How do you ensure that they fall into their footprint? The risk of their toppling over in a controlled demolision, especially after initial explosions on the upper floors, is inconceivably great.
artreddin wrote:I find the idea of destructive energy technology compelling as it is simply the type of weaponry one would think that the US quite capable of developing under the trillion dollars plus that had been poured into Star Wars research over the previous decades.
Finally, I find it ironic that so-called proof is given in this forum via photographic evidence (e.g., shots showing interiors of WTC suites, which really could be taken anywhere). An outsider could well question why he or she should believe your (i.e., the forum members') photos when the same techniques for photoshopping that you rightly draw attention to in faked images are also available to any contributor here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests