Brutal Metal wrote:
I thought during the 90's the Twin Towers and the businesses and institutions housed within was considered the Heart/Mother Brain of All the Worlds Financial markets with companies all over the world taking up office space there??
simonshack wrote:Eric Darton published in 1999 the most comprehensive 'biography' of the WTC twin towers. It is an essential read for insights into how the towers' tenants might have been 'controlled' - so to speak - after the first 1993 "Al-Qaeda" bombing. 'Divided We Stand' is also a treasure trove for anyone interested in the wheelings and dealings that - historically - have characterized these most cumbersome and disliked buildings.
YAMA, ARCHITECT OF TERROR
The World Trade Center was Yamasaki's most prestigious, highly visible commission. Its would-be levelers were, presumably, a band of terrorists who packed a van with explosives and detonated it in the basement garage. Their intention was to blow out the supporting columns along one wall of Tower 2, causing it to keel over and topple against its twin. Yamasaki had engineered his towers to withstand the force of a 747 shearing into them-the nightmare scenario of an earlier, more "innocent" era-and though shaken by the February 1993 blast, his squared-off tubes remained standing. Six people died, but scores of thousands might have if the columns had failed. Though the terrorists had used sufficient explosives to do the job, according to Eugene Faso, the Port Authority's chief engineer, they had built "the wrong kind of bomb."
Shortly after 9/11, ETA allegedly confirmed that in 1999 they had planned to demolish this skyscraper using the 1,700 kg of explosives loaded into two Madrid-bound vans intercepted that year near Calatayud (Zaragoza) by the Spanish Civil Guard
regex wrote:Why would the perps care if people die or not? They are such good people or what?
THE RATIONALE OF THE 9/11 HOAX
If you have come to terms with the fact that 9/11 was a massive money-making scheme and - of course - a pretext to wage hugely profitable wars, the basic rationale behind this Grand Deception should, hopefully, become clearer. It is essential to consider all the variables which such an audacious false-flag operation would entail and what precautions its plotters must have observed: The Grand Deception plan was undoubtedly meant to be foolproof and, ideally, free of unnecessary elements of risk and opposition. There was simply no rationale for the 9/11 plotters to commit a mass murder of some 3,000, mostly white-collar professionals (brokers, bankers, financial analysts, etc.) whose families would likely have access to first-rate, ‘uptown’ legal assistance. Surely, killing that many people would have been an utterly senseless, self-inflicted aggravation on the part of the perpetrators. Since they could reliably rely on the fully compliant ‘top-brass’ of the mainstream media, they would have used this unique, exclusive asset to its full potential.
Ever since day one, the major hurdle for many people to even start considering 9/11 being an ‘inside job’ has been: “I can’t believe my own government would murder 3000 of their own people". Once that psychological obstacle is removed, it should become apparent that the whole operation consisted essentially of a covert demolition of a redundant, asbestos-filled building complex. To kill thousands of people in the process never was an envisaged proposition as it would have encountered severe resistance among the insiders involved. The second objective was to blame this destruction on a foreign enemy; an inanely fanciful, outlandish tale involving hijacked airliners used as missiles was concocted, to be supported by digital imagery and special movie effects.
fbenario wrote:To my eyes, your comment is NOT remotely made in good faith.
reel.deal wrote:" ...the Heart/Mother Brain of All the Worlds Financial markets... ?? "
" These pictures are from the 91st floor during the summer of 2001. Where are the American Bureau of Shipping,
New Japan Securities International, Fukong Securities, Smart World Technologies, and Band-X, Inc., all of whom
are supposed to have leases on the 91st floor according to the Port Authority of NY/NJ ? "
Brutal Metal wrote:So this dismantling was taking place prior to the 93 bombing scenario?
fbenario wrote:Brutal Metal wrote:So this dismantling was taking place prior to the 93 bombing scenario?
Did you mean to say 'prior to 9/11?' I don't think anyone has posted here evidence about the pre-1993 period. You got any?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests