Is that anything like Quantum Mechanics?Quantam mechanics sounded outlandish to Einstein,
9/11 SIMCITY
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Well, Well, Well…
The WABC7 chopper footage has even more holes than Swiss cheese.
I was checking out the jumper (probably the only one to appear in the live, lame-stream media footage)
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Llo#t=425s
Let’s call him Felix (after my hero the red bull stratos jumper)
And as you check out Felix’s shadow in the original footage… WABC7 Footage you will see that it is not a shadow at all both Felix and his shadow are just CGI clones of each other. Here I will demonstrate. Here is Felix tumbling down after a red bull.
Notice his “jet stream shadow” is a complete clone of him??
Here, I applied a sharpener.
It’s clear as broad day light.
And they didn’t even re-render the shadow correctly in the Nist ABC DUB`
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Ixg#t=506s
Or the Jim Hortisie crap.
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhk ... age#t=550s
The masking lines are terrible….
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8D9dNCCLlo
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3UlAxwpIxg
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhkhCY
The WABC7 chopper footage has even more holes than Swiss cheese.
I was checking out the jumper (probably the only one to appear in the live, lame-stream media footage)
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Llo#t=425s
Let’s call him Felix (after my hero the red bull stratos jumper)
And as you check out Felix’s shadow in the original footage… WABC7 Footage you will see that it is not a shadow at all both Felix and his shadow are just CGI clones of each other. Here I will demonstrate. Here is Felix tumbling down after a red bull.
Notice his “jet stream shadow” is a complete clone of him??
Here, I applied a sharpener.
It’s clear as broad day light.
And they didn’t even re-render the shadow correctly in the Nist ABC DUB`
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Ixg#t=506s
Or the Jim Hortisie crap.
Jump link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhk ... age#t=550s
The masking lines are terrible….
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8D9dNCCLlo
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3UlAxwpIxg
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZJXNdhkhCY
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
To sum it up….
The jumpers shadow on the NTH tower that was shown live here on TV.
Is not the same as what appears in the other footage synched in the same time.
The other footage is
A-
NIST FOIA: Jim Huibregtse Clips 01-14A
November 2010
And B-
NIST FOIA: ABC Dub1 Clips 01-04
Uploaded on Nov 1, 2010
The supposed actual footage, which was re-released in November 2010.
Obviously re- rendered to hide the Muddy CGI.
BOTH OF THE ABOVE SHOTS SYNCHED ALL IN TIME.
Both feature a very basic blotch for a shadow of the supposed jumper.
But the WABC 7 LIVE SHOT (from that day) This was shown “Live” on WABC 7 NY. It features a tail behind the jumper, which also casts a shadow. When you watch the mentioned section over, and over again, you can see that the jumper and tail, and shadow and tail are the EXACT same animation. Clones! which are identical in appearance and also direction they travel.
In three easy steps I demonstrate
A- The Nist shot with its shadow (without the tail )
B- The Abc shot with its tail and shadow
C- The ABC shot again with some filters on it to highlight the abnormalities.
Mad props to Simon Shack and scooby clues crew, I never could upload a photo on my computer till I watched September Clues. I’m quite pleased with how much I have learned from him and the cool researchers on this forum.
The jumpers shadow on the NTH tower that was shown live here on TV.
Is not the same as what appears in the other footage synched in the same time.
The other footage is
A-
NIST FOIA: Jim Huibregtse Clips 01-14A
November 2010
And B-
NIST FOIA: ABC Dub1 Clips 01-04
Uploaded on Nov 1, 2010
The supposed actual footage, which was re-released in November 2010.
Obviously re- rendered to hide the Muddy CGI.
BOTH OF THE ABOVE SHOTS SYNCHED ALL IN TIME.
Both feature a very basic blotch for a shadow of the supposed jumper.
But the WABC 7 LIVE SHOT (from that day) This was shown “Live” on WABC 7 NY. It features a tail behind the jumper, which also casts a shadow. When you watch the mentioned section over, and over again, you can see that the jumper and tail, and shadow and tail are the EXACT same animation. Clones! which are identical in appearance and also direction they travel.
In three easy steps I demonstrate
A- The Nist shot with its shadow (without the tail )
B- The Abc shot with its tail and shadow
C- The ABC shot again with some filters on it to highlight the abnormalities.
Mad props to Simon Shack and scooby clues crew, I never could upload a photo on my computer till I watched September Clues. I’m quite pleased with how much I have learned from him and the cool researchers on this forum.
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
OH MY!! Can someone head on down to MATT@ http://www.911conspiracy.tv/index.html
And ask if he is feeling alright??
He stumbled across another BS 9/11 Photo (released 12 years later)
The blog where he found it at says..
Link- http://dave-hogan.blogspot.com.au/2012/ ... -real.html
And these are supposed to be the expert debunkers!!! bahahhaaa.. This is to easy. The 9/11 footage is fake. And Matt supposed credibilty has just gone out the window.
And ask if he is feeling alright??
He stumbled across another BS 9/11 Photo (released 12 years later)
The blog where he found it at says..
Link- http://dave-hogan.blogspot.com.au/2012/ ... -real.html
Matt has posted it here http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html#Unknown on his site and gone on to say---Is this real?
I have no idea. I was told that this came from a scanned picture taken on 9/11 by someone who sent it to someone who just put a link to it. I cropped it slightly, but I've never seen this angle before. I don't know if it's real, but if it is...
Wow.
To answer the blog's question: Yes, in my opinion it is a real shot from 9/11/2001 at 9:02:59 am EDT. Exact point of perspective: not yet mapped below.
And these are supposed to be the expert debunkers!!! bahahhaaa.. This is to easy. The 9/11 footage is fake. And Matt supposed credibilty has just gone out the window.
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
According to the EXIF data of the picture, the camera model that took the photo was a LG Electronics VS910 4G.
And the digital data of the picture was originally generated on 10/15/2011 at 12:20:53.
That's the bizarre explanation of the blogger about the origins of the picture:
And the digital data of the picture was originally generated on 10/15/2011 at 12:20:53.
That's the bizarre explanation of the blogger about the origins of the picture:
As I was told, it was emailed, printed, saved for about 7 years, while the original digital copy was lost, then scanned back in by someone who had printed a copy and mentioned it to me. I asked to see it and asked if they cared if I posted it. All that was cropped was the border of the print out.
-
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:23 am
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Simon, I don't know if anyone has pointed this whopper out yet from one of your early photos on page 1:
Notice the white slopped-roof building in front of "X". In the top left photo it has an extension on that building's left side! (viewer's right side). This is missing from the bottom right photo.
Notice the white slopped-roof building in front of "X". In the top left photo it has an extension on that building's left side! (viewer's right side). This is missing from the bottom right photo.
-
- Member
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:34 am
- Contact:
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Just a quick reminder what a United Airlines undercarriage looked like back in 2001..
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Exposing the 9/11 Memorial/museum fakery.
Simon as you recall, there is a movie produced by the 9/11 Memorial/Nauseum,
911: stories of survival and loss
Here is the original link to the movie it still does not work-
http://www.911memorial.org/site/PageSer ... vivalvideo
I was on there the other day and it looks like they have placed it back up!
Here- http://www.911memorial.org/images-videos/video/films (New link for the movie)
Surely this fakery is right up there with best of them, like the faux five chopper footage.
Simon as you recall, there is a movie produced by the 9/11 Memorial/Nauseum,
911: stories of survival and loss
We had discovered some fakery in the video… And one day you and I both verified that the movie had been taken down from the 9/11 memorial website?The movie featuring one-on-one interviews with victims' family members, and survivors of the attacks and first responders.
Here is the original link to the movie it still does not work-
http://www.911memorial.org/site/PageSer ... vivalvideo
I was on there the other day and it looks like they have placed it back up!
Here- http://www.911memorial.org/images-videos/video/films (New link for the movie)
Surely this fakery is right up there with best of them, like the faux five chopper footage.
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4ABHh3JBpc
Green screen magic at work.
-
- Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:31 pm
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
hi,was having a debate over the photo that simon posted on page 13 one that's quoted good eyes gary.
the talking point is the far lamp,they say it's camera angles,or a shift in perspective,as to why the far lamp is missing from the bottom photo..
doe's anyone know the street or junction these were filmed.
i found the location......https://maps.google.com/?ll=40.716737,- ... 3,,0,-1.58
now the person i was having a debate with said this is why its missing.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2033376/911/WAT.jpg
sorry for not putting the pics up,as i don;t know how to put them on here.
the talking point is the far lamp,they say it's camera angles,or a shift in perspective,as to why the far lamp is missing from the bottom photo..
doe's anyone know the street or junction these were filmed.
i found the location......https://maps.google.com/?ll=40.716737,- ... 3,,0,-1.58
now the person i was having a debate with said this is why its missing.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2033376/911/WAT.jpg
sorry for not putting the pics up,as i don;t know how to put them on here.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7341
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
*
Here's a question you surely must have often asked yourselves, folks:
"WHAT WOULD MANHATTAN LOOK LIKE ON OTHER PLANETS?"
Well, thanks to an illustrator and a NASA scientist we can finally lay this tormenting question to rest...
ON SATURN
ON NEPTUNE (No liberties allowed on Neptune)
ON VENUS
ON EARTH - (on September 11, 2001 only )
Here's a question you surely must have often asked yourselves, folks:
"WHAT WOULD MANHATTAN LOOK LIKE ON OTHER PLANETS?"
Well, thanks to an illustrator and a NASA scientist we can finally lay this tormenting question to rest...
ON MARSNYC In Space: Nickolay Lamm's Wild Illustrations Show Big Apple On Other Planets
"What would Manhattan's iconic skyline look like if NYC were suddenly beamed to another planet? Seven fantastical illustrations by Pittsburgh-based artist Nickolay Lamm suggest it would look, well, pretty different -- and not necessarily in the ways you might imagine.
The illustrations, put together with help from ex-NASA astrobiologist Dr. M. Browning Vogel, show what the Big Apple might look like on each of the other planets in our solar system."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/1 ... ref=topbar
ON SATURN
ON NEPTUNE (No liberties allowed on Neptune)
ON VENUS
ON EARTH - (on September 11, 2001 only )
-
- Member
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:00 pm
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Excellent, Simon!
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7341
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
*
The below frame (large image) is extracted from a most dramatic clip featuring a TV reporter standing right below the towers, on the shaded west side - "just as WTC2 collapses".
link to dramatic clip : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE7fWV2qUVU
It seems that some feeble attempt was made (by the animation team) to depict a few, dim office lights (in WTC1). Those 'office lights' just don't seem very convincing to me - considering this is meant to have been recorded by a professional broadcasting camera. To be sure, this 'washed-out' quality / resolution is an absurd, pervasive feature of the available 9/11 imagery.
That TV reporter was a mighty lucky fellow...
... and a pretty fast runner too (if NIST's figure of "9 seconds" - official collapse time of WTC2 - is true) !
Does anyone know who this reporter is ? I haven't been able to find out yet.
An interview with this fellow should be in order. Maybe on Fakeologist radio?
The below frame (large image) is extracted from a most dramatic clip featuring a TV reporter standing right below the towers, on the shaded west side - "just as WTC2 collapses".
link to dramatic clip : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IE7fWV2qUVU
It seems that some feeble attempt was made (by the animation team) to depict a few, dim office lights (in WTC1). Those 'office lights' just don't seem very convincing to me - considering this is meant to have been recorded by a professional broadcasting camera. To be sure, this 'washed-out' quality / resolution is an absurd, pervasive feature of the available 9/11 imagery.
That TV reporter was a mighty lucky fellow...
... and a pretty fast runner too (if NIST's figure of "9 seconds" - official collapse time of WTC2 - is true) !
Does anyone know who this reporter is ? I haven't been able to find out yet.
An interview with this fellow should be in order. Maybe on Fakeologist radio?
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
The reporters name is Newton Jones Burkett III, known as N.J. Burkett a correspondent for WABC-TV.
Not a great deal of information on the guy considering that he is supposed to have been awarded "many prestigious honors".
He is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences, New York and a Trustee of the National Academy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._J._Burkett
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 7341
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
- Location: italy
- Contact:
Re: 9/11 SIMCITY
Thanks a lot, mnew9 ! So Burkett's principal "claim to fame" is his coverage of 9/11? Fantastic.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
NOTE: A pen pal of mine has advised me to rethink my argument about the office lights. I can see / appreciate his point and have now removed my post and graphic about this issue which may have been ill-considered on my part and may only cause unnecessary controversy.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************
THE E-TEAM stunt of March 2001
You may wonder what the below image is about.
The E-TEAM stunt of March 29, 2001: http://www.guerrilla-innovation.com/arc ... 000675.php
"A few months before the senseless events on 9/11, the performance-group eteam took part in the LMCC artist in residence program that had studios on the 91st and 92nd floor of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. On the night of March 29 2001, the eteam created a temporary light-sculpture using illuminated windows in the North Tower to spell their name in capital letters. To create the letters, they needed 279 'dark' and 127 'light' windows on 7 floors (from 89th to 95nd). The event was carried out in collaboration with 12 offices located on the respective floors."
On their website, the E-team explains how they needed "7 floors" to create the E-TEAM word (floors 89 to 95). What a remarkable coincidence that, according to Wickedpedia, exactly 7 floors (93 to 99) were affected by "the impact of Flight 11"...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center
A few pictures of interest (from inside the WTC) courtesy of the E-TEAM's website:
Why are they interesting? Well - because of "KING KONG MAN", of course: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p2374833
The sloppy 9/11 animation team didn't even get the scale / proportions of the WTC building right !
What we were shown on TV on 9/11 was truly a SIMCITY. This has now been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
********************************************************************************************************************************************
NOTE: A pen pal of mine has advised me to rethink my argument about the office lights. I can see / appreciate his point and have now removed my post and graphic about this issue which may have been ill-considered on my part and may only cause unnecessary controversy.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************
THE E-TEAM stunt of March 2001
You may wonder what the below image is about.
The E-TEAM stunt of March 29, 2001: http://www.guerrilla-innovation.com/arc ... 000675.php
"A few months before the senseless events on 9/11, the performance-group eteam took part in the LMCC artist in residence program that had studios on the 91st and 92nd floor of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. On the night of March 29 2001, the eteam created a temporary light-sculpture using illuminated windows in the North Tower to spell their name in capital letters. To create the letters, they needed 279 'dark' and 127 'light' windows on 7 floors (from 89th to 95nd). The event was carried out in collaboration with 12 offices located on the respective floors."
On their website, the E-team explains how they needed "7 floors" to create the E-TEAM word (floors 89 to 95). What a remarkable coincidence that, according to Wickedpedia, exactly 7 floors (93 to 99) were affected by "the impact of Flight 11"...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_te ... ade_Center
A few pictures of interest (from inside the WTC) courtesy of the E-TEAM's website:
Why are they interesting? Well - because of "KING KONG MAN", of course: http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p2374833
The sloppy 9/11 animation team didn't even get the scale / proportions of the WTC building right !
What we were shown on TV on 9/11 was truly a SIMCITY. This has now been proven beyond any reasonable doubt.