CGI collapse footage

It has taken less than 10 years to pry open the can of worms enshrouding the pathetic 9/11 scam. The central role of the major newsmedia corporations to pull off this sordid "terror" simulation has now been comprehensively exposed. Before joining this forum, please get familiar with the research at: http://www.septemberclues.org
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

simonshack wrote:
Equinox wrote: Ok mate, I back-archived and re-loaded. ;)

Woah - well done, Equi ! :lol: :lol: :lol: :wub: "And then there were ten..."

:lol: Great clone family, of 7 videos and 3 photos...
Right folks so to Re-cap...

simonshack wrote: "The WTC2 COLLAPSE IMAGE-FAMILY"

No special photographic skills are required to assess the utter phoniness of the 9/11 IMAGE POOL: all what's needed is a healthy dose of common sense and a sound, rational mind. Now, whether the most glaring absurdities of this image pool were meant to be exposed - or if it was just caused by laziness/ sloppiness/ or over-confidence on the part of the perps - is a subject open for debate. Are the goons behind all this plain stupid? Foolhardy? Are they gauging the depth of the public's apathy? It matters little: The bottom line is, quite simply, that THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE. To debate just WHY this is the case may be an interesting exercise - but no such intellectual disquisitions could possibly help justify the absurd nature of these shots. Here follows a study of a (growing) 'family' of images published over the years, depicting the collapse of WTC2.

Up to a few years ago, this family had 'only' three members: I compiled them one by one - as I pursued my comprehensive scrutiny of all the available 9/11 STILL IMAGERY published by the news media. This photo-trio is officially credited to three different news media photographers:

- Thomas Nilsson (of the Norwegian populist tabloid "VG")
- Gulnara Samoilova (photo-retoucher for the Associated Press)
- Amy Sancetta (veteran photographer for the Associated Press)

We are asked to believe that all three of them captured the below three still photos of the WTC2. In addition to these images' remarkably similar viewing angles we can see that, by observing the smoke patterns, all three are clearly meant to have been snapped at
the exact same split second in time. Imagine that! (Moreover, one may legitimately wonder why the blue Millenium Hotel is entirely missing in image 1 and 2):
Image


But it gets sillier still. In 2010, a huge batch of never-seen-before, higher-quality 9/11 imagery suddenly emerged on the scene. The official explanation - get this - was that ABC (yes, the TV network!) had filed a FOIA to force NIST to release heaps of imagery that they had, allegedly, used for their investigations - and kept under wraps for all of 9 years!...

Well, most of this never-seen-before imagery comes in the form of short video clips (allegedly shot by "amateur videographers") which depict the crucial events of the day. At close inspection, most are nothing but rehashed/ re-rendered material which I was quite familiar with - having examined the 9/11 imagery for over half a decade now. But some of it is indeed brand new - and provides even further clues and confirmations as to how "the 9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" operates. I have expounded about this in depth elsewhere, so let me just show you here what can be found in these "brand new amateur videos":



So, we are now asked to believe that four cameras captured the exact same moment in time, from extraordinarily (if not impossibly) similar viewing angles/vantage points - AND zoom ratios. One only needs to calculate the odds of this occuring in the real world.
So, we are now asked to believe that [st]four [/st] 10 cameras captured the exact same moment in time.

Image
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

YURI FAKTOROVICH's CESSNA IMAGES - versus - THE NBC LIVE CHOPPER IMAGES
Here is another example showing that both the alleged "amateur" imagery and the TV imagery was crafted by the SAME FILM / ANIMATION STUDIO. Below, I compare a shot credited to one "Yuri Faktorovich", who allegedly flew by Manhattan around 9AM that morning. Now, think about it: what are the odds/possibilities that Yuri captured (through his Cessna window) a shot which looks extremely similar - in every respect - to the (alleged) NBC4 TV chopper, with its high-end camera equipment?
Image

NBC chopper shot-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... JRo#t=528s
Image

Yuri –
http://englishrussia.com/images/wtc_russian/3.jpg

There is another shot where NBC AGAIN Falls into the same clone template.

Image

Image

NBC Collapse shot YURI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... Ro#t=5535s


Yuri –

http://englishrussia.com/images/wtc_russian/3.jpg
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

ImageImage
Image

- Robert Clarke
- Tina Cart
- Wolfgang Staehle
- CBS
- Naudet Brothers
.

5- 9/11 shots all taken from the exact one location...


Image
Farcevalue
Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:21 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Farcevalue »

Weren't the Naudet brothers on the other side of the river filming the fireman/gas leak when the "first strike" occurred?
brianv
Member
Posts: 3971
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:19 pm
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by brianv »

Farcevalue wrote:Weren't the Naudet brothers on the other side of the river filming the fireman/gas leak when the "first strike" occurred?
You don't suppose that the name "Naudet" could be somebody's idea of a joke, as in, Naudets = No Deaths ?

Perhaps a reference to two of the planners.
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

Naudet itself get clone later on check this out----

Naudet 2001-

Image

Located- http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLB54 ... age#t=445s

Steve Vigilante
Released 2010
Image

Located- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... DX4#t=413s

LEFT: "Original Naudet images"_____________________________RIGHT: "New 2010 Steve Vigilante video:
Image
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

simonshack wrote: "The WTC2 COLLAPSE IMAGE-FAMILY"

No special photographic skills are required to assess the utter phoniness of the 9/11 IMAGE POOL: all what's needed is a healthy dose of common sense and a sound, rational mind. Now, whether the most glaring absurdities of this image pool were meant to be exposed - or if it was just caused by laziness/ sloppiness/ or over-confidence on the part of the perps - is a subject open for debate. Are the goons behind all this plain stupid? Foolhardy? Are they gauging the depth of the public's apathy? It matters little: The bottom line is, quite simply, that THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE. To debate just WHY this is the case may be an interesting exercise - but no such intellectual disquisitions could possibly help justify the absurd nature of these shots. Here follows a study of a (growing) 'family' of images published over the years, depicting the collapse of WTC2.

Up to a few years ago, this family had 'only' three members: I compiled them one by one - as I pursued my comprehensive scrutiny of all the available 9/11 STILL IMAGERY published by the news media. This photo-trio is officially credited to three different news media photographers:

- Thomas Nilsson (of the Norwegian populist tabloid "VG")
- Gulnara Samoilova (photo-retoucher for the Associated Press)
- Amy Sancetta (veteran photographer for the Associated Press)

We are asked to believe that all three of them captured the below three still photos of the WTC2. In addition to these images' remarkably similar viewing angles we can see that, by observing the smoke patterns, all three are clearly meant to have been snapped at
the exact same split second in time. Imagine that! (Moreover, one may legitimately wonder why the blue Millenium Hotel is entirely missing in image 1 and 2):
Image


But it gets sillier still. In 2010, a huge batch of never-seen-before, higher-quality 9/11 imagery suddenly emerged on the scene. The official explanation - get this - was that ABC (yes, the TV network!) had filed a FOIA to force NIST to release heaps of imagery that they had, allegedly, used for their investigations - and kept under wraps for all of 9 years!...

Well, most of this never-seen-before imagery comes in the form of short video clips (allegedly shot by "amateur videographers") which depict the crucial events of the day. At close inspection, most are nothing but rehashed/ re-rendered material which I was quite familiar with - having examined the 9/11 imagery for over half a decade now. But some of it is indeed brand new - and provides even further clues and confirmations as to how "the 9/11 IMAGE FAKERY FACTORY" operates. I have expounded about this in depth elsewhere, so let me just show you here what can be found in these "brand new amateur videos":



So, we are now asked to believe that four cameras captured the exact same moment in time, from extraordinarily (if not impossibly) similar viewing angles/vantage points - AND zoom ratios. One only needs to calculate the odds of this occuring in the real world.
10 OF A KIND--- "WTC2 COLLAPSE"
Image


12 OF A KIND - "BROOKLYN BRIDGE" SHOTS
Image

Image

10 OF A KIND- LINKS
12 OF A KIND- LINKS
Chris Hopewell Aka _Tina cart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL6C9 ... 0kA#t=214s
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/disco ... llapse.htm
Second plane hit, FOX, 9/11, 19:40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 1E0Tg#t=6s
Brooklyn Bridge
Link- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 2_80#t=23s
Howard Schickler (NEW Sept. 2011)
http://link.brightcove.com/services/pla ... 9745297001
Getty Images
http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/vi ... /118412149
Ilchaco
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZiSHQdD ... page#t=36s
NIST WTC Repository 618_WTCI_468_I
http://archive.org/details/618_WTCI_468_I?start=176.5
YouTube user passenger 247
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/1_WTC.html#passenger247
Unknown SE View
http://www.911conspiracy.tv/1_WTC.html# ... rom_Window
Sara K. Schwittek
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picture ... ml?image=3
Steve Ludlum (Pulitzer Prize)
http://11even.net/2010/09/photo-gallery ... nter/foto/
Robert Clark
http://www.robertclark.com/site/newSite/rc_main_01.html
Wolfgang 9/11
http://the911forum.freeforums.org/wtc1- ... -t416.html
Last edited by Equinox on Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:04 am, edited 4 times in total.
simonshack
Administrator
Posts: 7341
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:09 pm
Location: italy
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by simonshack »

*

Great work again, Equi.

The 9th Brooklyn Bridge shot (which you have credited to 'unknown') is supposedly by "Sara K. Schwittek" / REUTERS) :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picture ... ml?image=3


****************
And remember, folks: the Brooklyn Bridge shot was 'first seen' in the 1993 movie "SUPER MARIO BROTHERS": <_<

Image

How's that for 'predictive programming' ? (or whatever it's called...)
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

simonshack wrote:*

Great work again, Equi.

The 9th Brooklyn Bridge shot (which you have credited to 'unknown') is supposedly by "Sara K. Schwittek" / REUTERS) :
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picture ... ml?image=3


****************
Thanks Simon,
I have re-edited the photo and links. B)

Yes they did the predictive programming in the Naudet Film a shot taken supposedly taken on September 11 th (at dusk) the same Brooklyn Bridge "perp" spective.

NAUDET 9/11 at dusk Brooklyn Bridge BS..
Image
Jump to that part in the video right here--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLB54 ... VGg#t=327s


Image

Oh wait... :lol: :P

Image
Heiwa
Banned
Posts: 1062
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:20 pm
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Heiwa »

I like this thread very much. Since 5 February 2011 nobody has managed to show a real, true, valid, realistic picture of the WTC collapses from top down. All is just fake, fake, fake, CGI, CGI, CGI. And FBI doesn't react. Sleeping at the switches, as usual. :P :ph34r: :puke:
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

Image

Face book Comment-
To me personally they all look like stills taken from the videos as each video features these exact frames. So maybe the videos paused on certain frames and pictures took from that.
Let’s have a closer look.

The Pulitzer Prize one does not line up remotely line up with any movie

They are all different clones…
Only one of the perspectives is an EXACT CLONE to a movie --- That being- Robert Clark – Wolfgang- both line up with the Tina cart movie.

Image
ImageImage

The other that comes close is

Sara K. Schwittek and Howard Schickler (NEW Sept. 2011)

Although they are close, they are not an exact clone…

Image

http://i1131.photobucket.com/albums/m55 ... rision.jpg

THIS IS NOT SOME ABSURD COINCIDENCE….,. ALL THE IMAGERY IS FAKE...
Equinox
Banned
Posts: 549
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:45 am
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by Equinox »

simonshack wrote:*

Equi,
concentrate on what you do best (a most appreciated support as far as I'm concerned): the archiving of the SC source material - a time-consuming endeavor that you have shown to be willing and able to help us out with.

peace to all
9.00 am Friday Perth time here mate. Lets see how much I can get archived over the next 72 hours..
I will transfer it over to the archive section as well.

ARCHIVE
ABC7 and Peter Strid Clones.
Link-
http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f= ... 6#p2227338
ALL THE 9/11 IMAGERY, WHETHER CREDITED TO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA OR TO ALLEGED 'AMATEURS', IS THE WORK OF THE VERY SAME FILM STUDIO :
Image
ABC-
Link- (exact time)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... 9ik#t=187s
Peter Strid-
Link- (exact time)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... sL4h8#t=2s
XQB
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:43 am

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by XQB »

Equinox wrote:Naudet itself get clone later on check this out----

Naudet 2001-

Image

Located- http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLB54 ... age#t=445s

Steve Vigilante
Released 2010
Image

Located- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... DX4#t=413s

LEFT: "Original Naudet images"_____________________________RIGHT: "New 2010 Steve Vigilante video:
Image
This may have already been pointed out, but also the red construction sidewalk canopy is missing in the Naudet image. It runs nearly the entire length of the sidewalk in front of the dominant red building on the right in the Vigilante image, but completely absent in the Naudet photo.
nonhocapito
Member
Posts: 2579
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:38 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by nonhocapito »

.

Maybe it is silly and does not belong here in this excellent archive, in which case I apologize.
But, just to show to the random user "how deep the rabbit hole goes", I'd add to this series of two a third shot, from the infamous musical video "New York New York" by "Tha Dogg Pound/Snoop Dogg":

Image

"New York New York big city of dreams
And everything in New York ain't always what it seems"

Dated: 1995.
ptlive
Banned
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: CGI collapse footage

Unread post by ptlive »

terrible music, terrible video.
I tried an orrible experience, and saw entire video of them.
The frame is at 30 sec. from start circa.
In the rest of the video (terrible), the sky is strange, when there are image from studios.
Like tv news broadcasting of a particular day.... .
Post Reply