There is no conclusive proof that the towers fell at all. And possibly not at all for the same reason that they didnt use remote controlled airplanes... Unacceptable Risk. The "basins" in which the towers were built to keep the Hudson at bay could have been seriously damaged by either a top down or bottom up collapse of the two 1/2million ton towers crashing into them; possibly causing severe flooding of the whole island of Manhattan. My best guess would be - a slow casual gutting of the buildings took place over the years all that was left were the outer walls; which could quite easily been "craned" to earth.Heiwa wrote:The towers fell from bottom up, i.e. the strongest part (bottom) was destroyed first so that the weakest (top) part could fall down and destroy itself against bottom rubble and ground. It took about 20 seconds and most Manhattan residents could not see how the bottom was destroyed but maybe saw the tops fall.lozac boris wrote:How did the towers fell then, and where are all the Manhattan residents that day, where at least one would see the 'real' falling?
Evidently the (weak) tops could not fall down first and be crushing the (stronger) bottoms on the way down, because it is physically impossible. What was shown 'live on TV' was just a stupid animation. You can in fact fly in 1000 planes into the tops of towers and the the only part that will be damaged is the top. It is basic. Osama didn't grasp it, nor GWB/Condi/Obama = stupid people become terrorists or politicians. Or train drivers?
Fake a couple of videos and throw up a smokescreen versus 19 arab hijackers with plastic knives hijacking ex-military pilots and subduing the entire airplane, with no flying experience and no navigation; finding their targets and flying into the buildings twice in New York, which then explode and fall in the most preposterous fashion? No Contest!