FALLING MAN

[simonshack]

Simon, I just noticed something in that video that seems totally incongruent.

Not familiar with the "16-SECOND MAGIC SEQUENCE", are you Steve?

Here it is on my website: http://septemberclues.info/wtc_airplanes.htm


And here's another gif I made of it:



But yes, your observation is quite valid. If you look at the "International Shot" (ABC), the angle of the towers doesn't look right - in relation to the "Ball" shot (NBC), where we see the 'plane' disappearing behind the towers far too early - with respect to its apparent speed and trajectory (if this sequence had depicted a real event in the real world, that is!) Whoever composited this 16-second animated sequence had a pretty poor sense for time/space/perspective.

[brianv]

Don't you see what's going on here Simon? Questioning the footage as if it were somehow legitimate. It makes no difference which angle the fly walked across the screen in the latest Lookout Mountain studios, the "footage" was fabricated years prior to the event. Just like the towers were emptied years before [IF THEY WERE EVER POPULATED]. The static cameras in the sky yeah, the five mile zooms, the post-production software panning and shake. It was fed to the TV stations the same way the loony landings were, 4 decades ago. It worked that time. Why not use it again? There was NO footage taken on that day.

[truthseeker]

Don't you see what's going on here Simon? Questioning the footage as if it were somehow legitimate. It makes no difference which angle the fly walked across the screen in the latest Lookout Mountain studios, the "footage" was fabricated years prior to the event. Just like the towers were emptied years before [IF THEY WERE EVER POPULATED]. The static cameras in the sky yeah, the five mile zooms, the post-production software panning and shake. It was fed to the TV stations the same way the loony landings were, 4 decades ago. It worked that time. Why not use it again? There was NO footage taken on that day.

Right on Brian! You bring common sense, when there is none. As if they could make this movie in one day....

[brianv]

Don't you see what's going on here Simon? Questioning the footage as if it were somehow legitimate. It makes no difference which angle the fly walked across the screen in the latest Lookout Mountain studios, the "footage" was fabricated years prior to the event. Just like the towers were emptied years before [IF THEY WERE EVER POPULATED]. The static cameras in the sky yeah, the five mile zooms, the post-production software panning and shake. It was fed to the TV stations the same way the loony landings were, 4 decades ago. It worked that time. Why not use it again? There was NO footage taken on that day.

Right on Brian! You bring common sense, when there is none. As if they could make this movie in one day....

They wouldn't know which airplanes would be in use in the future (200?) - hence the abstract, child's drawing of a blob type thing which darted across our screens. WTF was that?

[simonshack]

*

"KING KONG MAN" update:

The absurd "King Kong Man" was actually aired on ABC on September 11, around 1PM:



Just for the record. http://archive.org/details/abc200109111241-1323