So much for WTC6 RUBBLE IMAGERY. Clearly forged horseshit. Period.
Let's now have a good look at the alleged WTC4 RUBBLE IMAGERY.
The idea was, of course, to provide alarming, gloomy and gripping sceneries to the public.
As many as 3 professional press photographers lent their names to these manipulated pictures. Shame be on them all. (I'm quite familiar with James Nachtwey since the late eighties - back then I was an avid reader of both Time magazine and Newsweek...):
Clockwise from top left: 1:Allan Tannenbaum - 2:Aris Economopoulos - 3 and 4: James Natchwey
As we take a closer look at these shots, here's what we may observe.
White spots are seen - and not seen - on top of the alleged WTC4 building.
You are free to believe that some goofy dude spilled his latte on the pictures...
And what about that beige area at the bottom of the WTC4 façade (above center image)?
Can you see that beige area in this other image credited to one Robert Segal? No - so which of the two WTC4 images is a fraud? The first one? The second one? Or more likely BOTH? Credited to "Robert Segal"(dated 2001/9/15): http://web.archive.org/web/200708171021 ... _id=151323
In the below photos, we see (on the left) two pieces of WTC2 who apparently tumbled down and landed upright, smashing into the tarmac slightly east of WTC4. On the right, we have a piece of rubble supposed to be a chunk of WTC4. Is it black? Is it white? It depends on which picture you prefer!
Do the perps drink too much Coca-Cola?
(Note: I have lightened the right half of the 2 above shots to show more details)http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0111/east08.htm
Here's the basic, same view again - seemingly at Christmas time...
Two more views from similar angles:Credited to "Robert Segal"(dated 2001/9/15): http://web.archive.org/web/200708171021 ... _id=151323
Here we compare two views which feature a moving traffic light:
Now, please get familiar with RUBBLE "A", RUBBLE "B", and RUBBLE "C":
Ooops!... Does RUBBLE "C" (meant to be the largest intact chunk of WTC4)
look like the very same building in both of these pictures? What the heck is going on here???