I have a critical view on the topic "Electronic Jamming on 9/11".
I absolutely do not agree, and I have many questions!
- There is a confusion between a working radio communication link and that electronics in general fail to work.
- There is a confusion between a cell phone's ability to communicate with the phone network, and its ability to take pictures. All phones take pictures, even if the net is down?
- The date when cell phones built-in cameras first appeared on the market. When?
- The wave-length region suitable for disrupting a video camera. The corresponding bending, reflection and absorption characteristics in an ordinary city. Nodes without any/low radiation ?
- Depending on the wave-length, if an attached cable to a Gadget would work as an reception antenna, and make the Gadget more sensitive to an input electrical field; to destroy it more easily.
- The field strength necessary to abort a video camera running on batteries without any cables.
- The field strength necessary to erase recorded material on the cassette of the camera.
- The field strength that would permanently kill the camera, so it will never work again. (no cables!)
- The field strength that would permanently kill ordinary electronics, without an attached cable, such as watches, toys, battery fire detectors, ..,
- The field strength that would permanently kill ordinary electronics, that do have an attached cable of some kind, such as car electronics, elevator electronics, room temperature control units, electricity meters, home electronics, computers, cassette players,..
- The field strength that would permanently kill ordinary electronics, that not only have a cable but actually some kind of input antenna, such as cell phones, police radios, TV reception amplification units, ordinary radios of all kinds, car radios, TV broadcast equipment, Police base-station, cell phone base-stations, and similar
- For all above, the number of transmit antennas, the energy conversion factor of the transmitter, and the energy source. How many watts?
- If a single pulse was used, at what time it should be applied; the recording prior to this moment will be recovered as the tape will not erase even if the camera dies. Similar discussion in the time-domain if a continuous transmission was used.
I refuse completely any idea including "secret military technology". The list above is to illustrate that
- To abort a video camera, you will need a high level of the field.
- You must destroy the camera. You can not switch it on and off. It will die!
- The recorded tape, up to the "bing", will survive!
- Most antenna-electronics will go dead, and cable-electronics would be approx 2x as sensitive as a video camera. One dose will be received directly by the electronics, and one dose extra for each attached cable.
Antenna units have sensitive input or output amplifiers. An antenna will receive a good dose and the coax will feed this directly into the electronics.
"Aiming" for the tripod-man would be rather absurd. Your antenna must be several wave-lengths wide for this to work. Problem finding the tripod, that can be far away.
I am rather upset how easy the above problems are ignored by using the "I have seen it" + "military secrets" in above posts.
I now offer an alternative theory, that don't need any EMP/fields, and kindly do prove me wrong! I have intentionally chosen an extreme approach, so it should be easy! One good picture is all we need ...
1) ALL the TV broadcast is pre-recorded (and fake), including the news-caster. It has been pre-viewed on a test-audience, such as common (?) in film industry (checking jokes, horror effects, timing, and psychological impact). This is rather different compared to the "September clues".
2) 9/11 was not a clear day. See thread on the "weather on 9/11", that have so forth not come to any conclusion on this. Any picture of any kind (marriage, party, ) approximately from the N.Y. area could help here.
3) Some parks (battery park+water) and other obvious good camera sites are cleared by Police.
4) In N.Y., the Event is released to the public only after the "second" "plane" such as at 9:00 (am, local). No need to mess with any "explosion" special-effect. The TV version of the "explosion" is fake, as it contain pictures of animals and heads (long list) so it was "hand-painted"; pre-recorded.
5) Smoke generators now run in both towers.
6) The Twin Towers go down by a controlled demolition, possibly slightly mis-synchronised compared to the TV version. Demolition is from bottom-up; both towers share the basement structure, so both towers "fall" at the same time. This prevent the South tower debris from killing the cable (with the red button) to the north tower. The concrete floors was shot into rectangular pieces, that fit on the lorries. You need approx 2000m of special explosives for each of the 230 floors to do this. This is why a fake debris pile was essential. No dead, and computers + furniture was evacuated in advance.
7) Most/many people tried to take photos or video of the Towers, but it became just a grey mess. This material can still be obtained. The camera/tripod man just simply believe in the "Official" version, so he is not around here and provide his grey pictures!
8) The "smoking" debris pile (about 50 m high !) was necessary to obscure the view, so no one could take a photo of the pile's dimensions/hight or see any rectangular concrete blocks, or possibly absence of "rescue" workers.
9) There was no rescue work of any kind.
10) The paper work (permits, licence) was in order, including certificate by owner + authorities to bring down the towers; lawyers representing surrounding buildings in agreement on liability and insurance for the job. This imply that approx no one made a criminal act on 9/11 (hoi.polloi was in strong disagreement with me on this point; I do share his frustration)
This (10) is simply a speculation of mine, and I have no facts what so ever; it simply make sense.
11) There is a "second" or "deeper" 9/11 story, that explain why the video is fake and why the general public need/must be fooled. It should include "Terrorists", and should be real scary, to force cooperation and secrecy. This would also be told to any local citizen who was not fooled and complain. This explain why many people can work on the task and no one come forward and speak of any truths. They do the right thing! It is legal! They are patriots!
This (11) is simply a speculation of mine, and I have no facts what so ever; it simply make sense.
I hope you find my thoughts interesting!